New research we’re reading

Recent papers on hair transplantation and hair loss that our surgeons are reading now, each with a short line on what it found. We add new ones every few months.

Updated: · 20 papers

About this list

These are recent papers (2023 to 2026) from medical journals. Each title opens its PubMed record, and we link the free full text where there is one.

Some cover treatments we don’t offer: we read them because patients ask about them. Nothing here is a promise about your result; your surgeon assesses you personally.

Questions · 4
  1. How are hair transplants done today?
  2. How safe is it, and how do you choose a clinic?
  3. Does it work for women and for Afro-textured hair?
  4. What else helps, and what is a myth?

How are hair transplants done today?

  1. Surgical Management for Hair Restoration: A Review of Contemporary Techniques (opens in a new tab)

    Othman S, Glat P. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(6):2415–2424. PubMed 37193885 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1007/s00266-023-03391-2 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: Compares the surgical options for hair loss, from FUE and strip transplants to scalp flaps and scalp reduction, and when each is used. The right choice depends on the cause of the hair loss, the patient and the surgeon’s experience.

    Review

  2. Unshaven Follicular Unit Excision: Critical Analysis of Current Nomenclature and Proposal for Standardized Terminology (opens in a new tab)

    Jimenez F, Gupta AK, Shapiro R, Talukder M. Dermatol Surg. 2026;52(8):736–742. PubMed 41805884 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1097/DSS.0000000000005049 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: "Unshaven" means different things in different adverts. The authors propose five clear categories, from fully shaven to long-hair FUE, defined by how the donor area is harvested, so patients know exactly what they are being offered.

    Review

  3. Evaluation of a Novel Graft-Holding Solution in Hair Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study (opens in a new tab)

    Zhou Y, Zhang J, Fan Z, et al. Dermatol Surg. 2023;49(7):675–681. PubMed 37036372 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003799 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: A randomised trial in 240 patients compared two solutions for keeping grafts alive outside the body. With the newer solution, fewer patients had shedding after sessions of 3,000 grafts or more, and regrowth started earlier. Final graft survival was the same in both groups.

    Randomised trial

How safe is it, and how do you choose a clinic?

  1. Complications Following Hair Transplantation: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis (opens in a new tab)

    Khatib M, Skorochod R, Wolf Y. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;49(23):6393–6405. PubMed 40913181 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-05125-y (opens in a new tab)

    In short: Brings together 45 published studies and case reports. Hair transplantation was generally safe. Pain and swelling at the donor area were the most reported problems, and scarring at the recipient area. A rare blood-vessel complication in the donor area was linked to one punch technique.

    Systematic review and meta-analysis

  2. Complications in follicular unit excision hair transplantation: current evidence and practical approaches (opens in a new tab)

    Romera de Blas C, Vega Díez D, Ricart Vayá JM, Gómez Zubiaur A. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026;13:1750989. PubMed 41709896 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.3389/fmed.2026.1750989 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: A practical review of what can go wrong after FUE, from swelling and infection to donor depletion, folliculitis and shedding, and how careful patient selection, graft handling and aftercare prevent most of it.

    ReviewFree full text (opens in a new tab)

  3. An Analysis of Risk Factors of Recipient Site Temporary Effluvium After Follicular Unit Excision: A Single-Center Retrospective Study (opens in a new tab)

    Okochi H, Onda M, Momosawa A, Okochi M. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024;48(7):1258–1263. PubMed 37816944 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1007/s00266-023-03699-z (opens in a new tab)

    In short: In 621 FUE patients, temporary shedding of existing hair (shock loss) was much more common in women than in men, and in women it became more likely with age.

    Retrospective study

  4. The Allures and the Alarms of the Hair Transplant Tourism Industry (opens in a new tab)

    Haider SA, Hasanzade S, Borna S, et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;49(17):4745–4753. PubMed 40660034 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-05018-0 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: Plastic surgeons at the Mayo Clinic review hair transplant tourism, with Istanbul as the main example: lower prices and all-inclusive packages on one side; unsupervised technicians, aggressive marketing and poor reporting on the other. The warning signs it describes are the ones in our guide to choosing a clinic.

    ReviewRead more on our site

Does it work for women and for Afro-textured hair?

  1. Follicular Unit Excision in Patients of African Descent: A Skin-Responsive Technique (opens in a new tab)

    Umar S, Khanna R, Lohlun B, et al. Dermatol Surg. 2023;49(10):949–955. PubMed 37530735 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003881 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: Curly hair and thick, firm skin make FUE harder in patients of African descent. In 64 patients at seven clinics, a device that adapts to the skin kept graft damage to 3–6% on average, and skin thickness mattered more than curl. The first author holds patents on the device.

    Retrospective multicentre studyFree full text (opens in a new tab)Read more on our site

What else helps, and what is a myth?

  1. Androgenetic alopecia (opens in a new tab)

    Liu Y, Tosti A, Wang ECE, et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025;11(1):73. PubMed 41068174 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1038/s41572-025-00656-9 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: An overview of pattern hair loss by international experts. More than 380 genetic regions are linked to it. The treatments with good evidence are transplanting resistant hair from the back of the head, finasteride and topical minoxidil; newer approaches are still in development.

    ReviewRead more on our site

  2. Oral Minoxidil vs Topical Minoxidil for Male Androgenetic Alopecia: A Randomized Clinical Trial (opens in a new tab)

    Penha MA, Miot HA, Kasprzak M, Müller Ramos P. JAMA Dermatol. 2024;160(6):600–605. PubMed 38598226 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0284 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: In 90 men over 24 weeks, oral minoxidil tablets were not better overall than minoxidil solution; photos favoured the tablet on the crown only. Unwanted body hair was common with the tablet.

    Randomised trialFree full text (opens in a new tab)Read more on our site

  3. Summation and recommendations for the safe and effective use of topical and oral minoxidil (opens in a new tab)

    Olsen EA, Sinclair R, Hordinsky M, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025;93(2):457–465. PubMed 40216195 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.04.016 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: Hair-loss dermatologists set out how they use topical minoxidil and low-dose oral minoxidil safely. Oral use is off-label and had no agreed best practice until now.

    Expert recommendationsRead more on our site

  4. Dutasteride for the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia: An Updated Review (opens in a new tab)

    Ding Y, Wang C, Bi L, et al. Dermatology. 2024;240(5–6):833–843. PubMed 39278205 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1159/000541395 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: In the studies reviewed, oral dutasteride worked better than finasteride with similar tolerability, but sexual side effects and possible psychiatric risks still need attention. Injected and topical forms are being studied.

    ReviewRead more on our site

  5. Platelet-Rich Plasma for Androgenetic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (opens in a new tab)

    Zhang X, Ji Y, Zhou M, et al. J Cutan Med Surg. 2023;27(5):504–508. PubMed 37533146 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1177/12034754231191461 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: Nine randomised trials with 238 patients: PRP increased hair density at 3 and 6 months compared with placebo, but not hair count or thickness. The trials were small, which is why we call the evidence for PRP mixed.

    Systematic review and meta-analysisRead more on our site

  6. Does creatine cause hair loss? A 12-week randomized controlled trial (opens in a new tab)

    Lak M, Forbes SC, Ashtary-Larky D, et al. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2025;22(sup1):2495229. PubMed 40265319 (opens in a new tab). DOI 10.1080/15502783.2025.2495229 (opens in a new tab)

    In short: Patients who train often ask this. In 38 men doing resistance training, daily creatine for 12 weeks did not change DHT or any hair measure compared with placebo. It is a small, short study, and some of its authors advise supplement companies.

    Randomised trialFree full text (opens in a new tab)Read more on our site

The references behind the medical statements on our own pages are listed separately. Sources

From the research to your own plan

Send four photos. Our lead surgeon replies with your plan, a graft estimate and the full price, usually within 24 hours. Free, and you are not committing to anything.

Like any surgery, a hair transplant has risks. They include infection, scarring, shock loss and grafts that grow poorly. Read about the risks